Legal Opinion
Quikey Manufacturing Co. v. City Products Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided October 3, 1967No. Civ. A. No. C 64-564PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
KALBFLEISCH, Chief Judge.
1. The plaintiff in this action is Quikey Manufacturing Company, Inc., a corporation of Ohio having a place of business in Akron, Ohio.
2. The defendant in this action is City Products Corporation, a corporation of Ohio having a place of business in Akron, Ohio.
3. United States Reissue Patent No. 24,166, the patent in suit, was granted on June 12, 1956 to Benjamin Stiller, now deceased. On December 31, 1959, Benjamin Stiller assigned said patent to plaintiff, and plaintiff has continuously been and still is the owner of said…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Shepard v. CarriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- U. S. Industrial Chemicals, Inc. v. Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- William T. Graham and Graham-Hoeme Plow Co., Inc. v. Cockshutt Farm Equipment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Squeez-A-Purse Corp. v. StillerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1959
- Walters v. CrandalDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1881
3Cited by2 opinions
- Quikey Manufacturing Co. Inc. v. City Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- St. Regis Paper Company v. Tee-Pac, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1973