Legal Opinion

Jespersen et al v. Colony Insurance Company

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided May 22, 2023No. 21-cv-846-JLPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Jespersen et al v. Civil No. 21-cv-846-JL Opinion No.

2023 DNH 064

Colony Insurance Company MEMORANDUM ORDER At issue in these cross-motions for summary judgment are the applicability of the compulsory insurance doctrine, and an injured party’s right to recover under an insurance policy notwithstanding the insured’s failure to satisfy the insurance contract’s notice requirements. The plaintiffs in this case, Margaret and David Jespersen, are New Hampshire residents who obtained a default judgment in state court against the owner- operator…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. American Tobacco Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Cabán Hernández v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  3. Calvi v. Knox CountyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  4. Vera v. McHughCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  5. Jam v. International Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2019

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jespersen v. Colony Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2023
  2. Jespersen v. Colony Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API