Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Kirwin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 2009No. 80113-4Published

1DissentSanders, J.

¶39 (dissenting) — The majority permits the State to search an automobile incident to the arrest of a passenger for littering, even though state law did not authorize the arrest. I disagree. The arrest of a passenger in a car does not automatically authorize the police to search a car being driven by, and belonging to, another individual. And, even if the arrest of the passenger could justify the search of the car, the arrest of the passenger here was invalid and could not be used to justify any search. The arrest was invalid because the police officer arrested the passenger under a local…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. State v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. StroudWashington Supreme Court · 1986

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API