Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. Hasselstrom

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1918No. File No. 4046Published

Appeal from Circuit Court, Pennington County. Hon. Revi McGee, Judge. Action by Austa Kennedy, against A. F. Hasselstrom, to recover purchase pni-ce paid -by plaintiff fo-r certain personalty purchased- of defendant. From a judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying a- new trial, defendant appeals.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Circuit Court, Pennington County. Hon. Revi McGee, Judge. Action by Austa Kennedy, against A. F. Hasselstrom, to recover purchase pni-ce paid -by plaintiff fo-r certain personalty purchased- of defendant. From a judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying a- new trial, defendant appeals. (i) To point one of the opinion, (subid, i), Appelant cited: Connor v. Henderson, 15 Mass., 319; Strong v. Strong 102 N. Y., 69. To s-uibd. 2; B-o-wen v. Mamdervillie, 95 N. Y., 237; and cases cited in the text; 6 Ruling Case Raw, 932, Sec. 316, and cases cited in the notes. Respondents…

1Opinion of the CourtWhiting, P. J.

By plaintiff’s -original complaint, she sought to recover the price -she had paid for certain personal -property purchased of defendant, basing such claimed right of recovery on an alleged rescission of the purchase. Her amended complaint, while containing an -allegation of an offer -to rescind --and a refusal of defendant to accept a return of the property purchased, contained all the essential allegations -of an action for damages caused bj' fraúd and' deceit. - Such alleged fraud and deceit consisted-in'false'representations that defendant was the owner of the *64property. The trial court…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hull v. CaldwellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API