Ryan v. Carter
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
This case involves the seldom-used remedy of amercement, which is described in R.C. Chapter 2707. While it is questionable why this archaic procedure remains, this court will enforce R.C. Chapter 2707 until the General Assembly removes it from the books.
To amerce is to punish. 1 Oxford English Dictionary (2 Ed.1989) 396-397. R.C. 2707.01 delineates when an action for amercement is appropriate. The statute provides:
“If an execution or order of sale directed to an officer comes to his hands to be executed, and he neglects or refuses to execute it * * *, on motion in court, and notice thereof,…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Takacs v. BaldwinOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Myers v. Hadsell Chem. Processing, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
- FRC Project, L.L.C. v. Canepa Media Solutions, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Morris v. Erieway, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Home S. & L. Co. of Youngstown v. Avery Place, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.