Legal Opinion

Melnitzky v. Hollander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 10, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered January 23, 2004, which granted defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (7) to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The causes of action for legal malpractice and breach of contract, which allege that defendant misrepresented that he would continue to advise plaintiff in the underlying action notwithstanding his formal withdrawal, were properly dismissed upon unrefuted evidence that the parties’ last communication involving the subject matter of the representation occurred almost five years…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shumsky v. EisensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Weiss v. ManfrediNew York Court of Appeals · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Melnitzky v. Apple Bank for SavingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Amendola v. KendziaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Whale Telecom Ltd. v. Qualcomm Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API