Legal Opinion

Chas. H. Lilly Co. v. Parrino

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1943No. 29031PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

Plaintiff, Chas. H. Lilly Company, a corporation, sued A. Parrino and Joseph Santilli, asking judgment for damages for breach of a contract to deliver seeds. The defendants appeared separately, and the action proceeded to trial before the court sitting without a jury. The court entered findings of fact and conclusions of law in favor of plaintiff, followed by a joint and several judgment against defendants, bearing date July 31, 1942, from which judgment Joseph Santilli has appealed.

It appears from the transcript that, after the entry of the judgment, the defendants joined in a motion for new…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of LevasWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Hamilton v. Kiona-Benton Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. State Ex Rel. Grange Store v. RiddellWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Wheeler v. S. Birch & Sons Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Levas v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API