Legal Opinion

Matter of Pflomm

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 20, 1925PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The Appellate Division has decided that the will suifitiiently shows an intent on the part of the testator that such parts of the Federal and State income taxes as are assessed against his widow, Kate A. Johnson, by reason of her receipt of half of the net income of the trust fund created under paragraph third of the will should be borne and paid out of the “ general estate ” as provided in paragraph fourth of the will. A majority of the judges of this court have reached the same conclusion.

The Appellate Division has further decided that the words “ general estate ” as used in that paragraph…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bergan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  2. In re the Estate of ClineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  3. Bergan v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
  4. Toretta v. Wilmington Trust Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1947
  5. In re the Construction of the Will of MillegNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API