Collins v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
The plaintiffs in error will be referred to as defendants, as in the court below.
The record discloses that defendants were convicted of maintaining a nuisance and each sentenced to pay a fine and to imprisonment in the county jail. The defendants were duly arraigned, pleaded not guilty, and were tried to a jury.
The only assignments of error urged by the defendants which are necessary to consider are as follows:
“First, error in overruling the defendants’ demurrer to the information; second, error in overruling the defendants’ motion to strike from the setting of the criminal docket ; third,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Speer v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- State v. MoserWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Luther v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920
- State v. RobeyWashington Supreme Court · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
- Gallego v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1955
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
- Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994