Legal Opinion

Collins v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided August 11, 1925No. A-4965PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

The plaintiffs in error will be referred to as defendants, as in the court below.

The record discloses that defendants were convicted of maintaining a nuisance and each sentenced to pay a fine and to imprisonment in the county jail. The defendants were duly arraigned, pleaded not guilty, and were tried to a jury.

The only assignments of error urged by the defendants which are necessary to consider are as follows:

“First, error in overruling the defendants’ demurrer to the information; second, error in overruling the defendants’ motion to strike from the setting of the criminal docket ; third,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Speer v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  2. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. State v. MoserWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Luther v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. State v. RobeyWashington Supreme Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Gallego v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1955
  3. State v. JohnsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
  4. Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. State v. JohnsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API