Legal Opinion

A.M. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 29, 2000No. 4D99-1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShahood, J.

We affirm the disposition order adjudicating appellant guilty of petit theft, but remand for re-sentencing.

The trial court did not err in denying appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal. The elements of petit theft are: knowingly obtaining or using, or endeavoring to obtain or use, the property of another with intent to either temporarily or permanently “(a) Deprive the other person of a right to the property or a benefit from the property [or] (b) Appropriate the property to his or her own use or to the use of any person not entitled to the use of the property.” § 812.014(1), Fla. Stat.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. A.B.G. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. M.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. T.A.R. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  4. T.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  5. D.A.D. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. J.B. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. J.N. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  3. J.N. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API