Legal Opinion

State v. Louey

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1884PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Baker County.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court:

The indictment in this case clearly charges the crime of riot, under the first sentence of section 639 of our criminal statutes. (See Bish. Orim. Prac., see. 992.) The details entered into in the indictment, which go to show that the crime of robbery was also committed, when it is not the intent to indict for that crime, are but surplusage.

The instructions referred to on page 5 of the appellant’s brief were grounded on the subsequent provisions of section 639, which were not involved in the case before the court, and consequently were correctly refused. It is sufficient for the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HorneOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  2. State v. DormitzerOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  3. State v. LeeOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  4. State v. EmmonsOregon Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API