Legal Opinion
City of San Antonio v. Arden Encino Partners, Ltd.
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
Decided March 12, 2003No. 04-01-00008-CVPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
Opinion by
PAUL W. GREEN, Justice.
The motion for rehearing of appellant Arden Encino Partners, Ltd. is denied. However, the opinion and judgment issued on June 12, 2002 are withdrawn and the following is substituted.
The trial court granted summary judgment to Arden Encino Partners, Ltd. (AEP) and permanently enjoined the City of San Antonio from implementing a zoning change to AEP’s property. On appeal, the City claims the summary judgment was improper because AEP failed to carry its summary judgment burden. We agree with the City and reverse the trial court’s judgment.
Ba…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1905
- City of University Park v. BennersTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Valores Corporativos, S.A. De C v. v. McLane Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
- City of Pharr v. TippittTexas Supreme Court · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Weatherford v. City of San Marcos, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
- Super Wash, Inc. v. City of White SettlementCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
- City of San Antonio v. TPLP OFFICE PARK PROPERTIES, LTD., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004
- Babcorp 200, Ltd. v. City of Grand Prairie, Texas, Victoria Hess, and Jeff Ricci, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2025
- City of Gatesville, Texas v. Larry Hughes and Glenda Hughes, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.