Rotemi Realty, Inc. v. Act Realty Co., Inc.
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
We consider whether the common practice of paying real estate commissions contingent on consummation of the sale violates the public policy of this state when applied to a purchase or sale by the government. In the decision we review, the Third District Court of Appeal invalidated such an arrangement, concluding that "contracts which provide for contingency awards for securing public monies are against public policy." Act Realty Co. v.Rotemi Realty, Inc., 863 So.2d 334, 336 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (citing City of Hialeah Gardens v. John L. Adams Co.,599 So.2d 1322 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 613…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- State v. GraySupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- State v. SchoppSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. MeeksSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Dorsey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Moonlit Waters Apartments, Inc. v. CauleySupreme Court of Florida · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Valdes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
- State of Florida v. Budry MichelSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
- Westgate Miami Beach, Ltd. v. Newport Operating Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 2010
- State v. SturdivantSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
- Allenby & Associates, Inc. v. Crown "St. Vincent" Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.