Legal Opinion

Bryant v. Boulevard Story, LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 11, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs submissions in opposition to defendants’ motions, including her deposition testimony and her affidavit estimating that the subject elevator misleveled by approximately V-h to 2V2 *429inches, were sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether defendant Uplift Elevator, Inc. (Uplift) was negligent in failing “to discover and correct a [misleveling problem] which it ought to have found” (Oettinger v Montgomery Kone, Inc., 34 AD3d 969, 970 [2006], quoting Rogers v Dorchester Assoc., 32 NY2d 553, 559 [1973]; see also Dickman v Stewart Tenants Corp., 221 AD2d 158 [1995]).…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Dorchester AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Burgess v. Otis Elevator Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Burgess v. Otis Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Dickman v. Stewart Tenants Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Oettinger v. Montgomery Kone, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. Thyssen Dover Elevator Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. McLaughlin v. Thyssen Dover Elevator Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API