Bryant v. Boulevard Story, LLC
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiffs submissions in opposition to defendants’ motions, including her deposition testimony and her affidavit estimating that the subject elevator misleveled by approximately V-h to 2V2 *429inches, were sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether defendant Uplift Elevator, Inc. (Uplift) was negligent in failing “to discover and correct a [misleveling problem] which it ought to have found” (Oettinger v Montgomery Kone, Inc., 34 AD3d 969, 970 [2006], quoting Rogers v Dorchester Assoc., 32 NY2d 553, 559 [1973]; see also Dickman v Stewart Tenants Corp., 221 AD2d 158 [1995]).…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rogers v. Dorchester AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Burgess v. Otis Elevator Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Burgess v. Otis Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Dickman v. Stewart Tenants Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Oettinger v. Montgomery Kone, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McLaughlin v. Thyssen Dover Elevator Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- McLaughlin v. Thyssen Dover Elevator Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014