Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Barnes

District Court, D. Utah

Decided August 3, 1990No. 89-C-0649-SPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAM, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on Petitioner William Andrews’ Objection to the magistrate’s Report and Recommendation (R & R) dated May 10, 1990. 1 In that comprehensive R & R the magistrate recommended that this court deny Mr. Andrews’ supplemental petition. Mr. Andrews objected to the R & R 2 and, as part of that objection, requested that this court conduct extensive evidentiary hearings in connection with a de novo review and hearing on the objection.

The applicable statute (28 U.S.C. § 636) requires this court to review the R & R under a de novo standard, but does not…

2Cases cited120 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Andrews v. DelandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. John R. Hicks v. Terry Collins, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  3. Andrews v. CarverDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1992
  4. Hicks v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  5. John R. Hicks v. Terry Collins, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API