Legal Opinion · Dissent

Great American Indemnity Co. v. Bailey

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 19, 1953No. Series 5-67Published

1DissentWard, J.

It is my best judgment, reluctantly arrived at due to sympathy for appellee, that the majority opinion reaches an erroneous conclusion, and that the error is such moment that it deserves comment.

Due to the facts and issues in this case, regardless of whatever view may be taken, appellee is not entitled to recover if in fact he was an agricultural farm laborer as that term is used in Ark. Stats., § 81-1302 (c) (1).

To begin with, agricultural farm labor is a broader term than farm labor. Many cases have held this to be true. In the case of Cook v. Massey, (Idaho), 220 P. 1088, it was stated…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cook v. MasseyIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Beyer v. DeckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
  3. Matis v. SchaefferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  4. Greischar v. St. Mary's CollegeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  5. Pridgen v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API