Legal Opinion

Harbison v. Briggs Bros. Paint Mfg. Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1962Published

1Opinion of the Court

354 S.W.2d 464 (1962)

James M. HARBISON

v.

BRIGGS BROS. PAINT MFG. CO.

Supreme Court of Tennessee.

February 8, 1962.

Karl L. Bishop, Joseph L. Lackey, Nashville, for petitioner.

Cate & Cate, George H. Cate, Jr., Nashville, for respondent.

FELTS, Justice.

This was an action at law in tort for personal injuries. The Trial Judge entered a judgment of dismissal, upon the jury's response to a single interrogatory submitted by him to them. The Court of Appeals held this was error, but harmless, and affirmed. We granted plaintiff's petition for certiorari, and the case has been heard here.

The action was…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Capital Traction Co. v. HofSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  4. Walker v. New Mexico & Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Huffman v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1956

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API