Legal Opinion

Lindsay v. . Short

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchenck, J.

“The right to dismiss an action for want of jurisdiction by entering a special appearance for the purpose is imbedded in our procedure.” Smith v. Haughton, 206 N. C., 587.

It is provided by the statute, section 491 (a), N. C. Code of 1935. (Micbie), that the acceptance by a nonresident of the right and privilege to operate a motor vehicle on the public highways of the State “shall be deemed, equivalent to the appointment by such nonresident of the Commissioner of Revenue . . . to be bis true and lawful attorney upon whom may be served all summonses or other lawful process in any action or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. . HaughtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Williams v. . CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Aldrich v. JohnsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  4. Secured Casualty Insurance v. SinelnikoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API