Legal Opinion

United States v. Herbert Ott

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 5, 1973No. 73-1251PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEVENS, Circuit Judge.

The principal question is whether a material misstatement to the trial judge is the kind of prosecutorial misconduct which requires reversal. Possibly because we are influenced by the prosecutor’s failure to acknowledge the error in his brief, or at the opening of oral argument, in this court, we conclude that it does. We also hold that defense counsel was entitled, during cross-examination of an important witness, to learn where and by whom the witness was employed.

Defendant was indicted for knowingly possessing checks stolen from the mail in violation of 18 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Cannon v. US Acoustics CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  3. United States v. Amos Lane BridgesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
  4. United States v. Duane R. Olson, Also Known as Duke, and George MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. Lewis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API