Legal Opinion

State v. Ramsey

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On certiorari. Argued at February Term, 1892, before Justices Magie and Werts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Werts, J.

An assessment for taxes, for the year 1891, •was levied by the assessor of Raritan township, Iiunderdon •county, upon shares of the capital stock of the Pennsylvania, the Lehigh Valley and the Philadelphia and Reading Railroad Companies, owned by the prosecutor.

This writ of certiorari is brought to restrain the defendant, ■as collector of the township, from collecting the tax so imposed.

By the agreed-on state of the case it appears that the prosecutor is a resident of Hunterdon county, this state; that the three companies named are all foreign…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Darcy v. DarcySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
  2. Inhabitants of Trenton v. Standard Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  3. City & County of Denver v. Hobbs EstateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API