Legal Opinion
Ann Arbor R. v. Michigan Public Service Commission
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided July 6, 1950No. Civ. A. 9198PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVIN, District Judge.
This three-judge court is convened under the authority of Title 28, U.S.C.A. § 2281, on plaintiff’s application for an interlocutory injunction enjoining the Michigan Public Service Commission and others from enforcing its order that plaintiff operate one passenger train daily in each direction between Durand and Frankfort, Michigan.
Plaintiff alleges that enforcement of the order will result in an unconstitutional deprivation of its property and irreparable losses in substantial amounts.
The defendants have not answered the petition. They move its dismissal, contending…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- American Federation of Labor v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Prendergast v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Bacon v. Rutland RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- State Corporation Comm'n of Kan. v. Wichita Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- City of Newton v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. Department Of Public Service RegulationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- Chicago & North Western Railway Co v. City of NorfolkNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
- Central Steel & Wire Co. v. City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.