Drivas v. Lekas
New York Court of Appeals
I. Upon the found and approved facts and because of the malicious acts of the defendants Lekas and Katsoris that frustrated and destroyed the voting trust plan, plaintiff is entitled to have the voting trust provisions of the settlement agreements nullified and his stock returned to him, or Lekas & Drivas, Inc. dissolved or both. (Harrington v. Harrington, 290 N. T. 126; Kroger v. Jaburg, 231 App.
Read the full summary
I. Upon the found and approved facts and because of the malicious acts of the defendants Lekas and Katsoris that frustrated and destroyed the voting trust plan, plaintiff is entitled to have the voting trust provisions of the settlement agreements nullified and his stock returned to him, or Lekas & Drivas, Inc. dissolved or both. (Harrington v. Harrington, 290 N. T. 126; Kroger v. Jaburg, 231 App. Div. 641; Kavanaugh v. Kavanaugh Knitting Go., 226 N. Y. 185; Matter of Kaufman Circle Express Go., Inc., 177 Mise. 106; Tower Hill Gonnellsville Coke Go. v. Piedmont Goal Go., 64 F. 2d 817, 290 U.…
1Per curiam
Where the record contains substantial evidence supporting findings made at Special Term and which are unreversed by the Appellate Division, those findings are conclusive in this court. (Harrington v. Harrington, 290 N. Y. 126, 130.) In the record before ns are unreversed findings, supported by substantial evidence, that the plaintiff’s employment contract dated March 1, 1937, has not been terminated by the defendant Lekas & Drivas, Inc.; that at a meeting of the corporation’s board of directors held on May 20, 1938, formal action was taken, which has not been rescinded, with respect to the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Harrington v. HarringtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
3Cited by3 opinions
- Drivas v. LekasNew York Supreme Court · 1944
- New York Central Railroad v. New York & Harlem RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1948
- Drivas v. LekasNew York Court of Appeals · 1944