In re Daniel R.

Appellant’s challenge to the facial sufficiency of the menacing count of the petition is without merit. The petition and its sup*267porting deposition contained specific allegations supporting the element of intent to place the victim in fear of physical injury (see Penal Law § 120.15), namely, that appellant threatened to injure the victim, struck him, and threatened to cause further injury.

To the extent that appellant is challenging the legal sufficiency of the evidence presented at the fact-finding hearing, that claim is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an…