Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Lack v. Meads

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1908No. 7282PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Clifford, J., entered September 28, 1907, dismissing an action for a mandamus, after a trial on the merits before the court.

1Per curiam

Some time prior to the 11th day of May, 1907, the city of Tacoma purchased sand and gravel from one C. D. Elmore, of the value of $140.75, for which amount a claim was presented to the city council. After the presentation of the claim, but before its allowance, the claim was assigned to the relator Lack. After the assignment to Lack, the city council allowed the claim as presented, and *469credited the amount on an unpaid judgment held by the city against Elmore. The relator thereupon demanded a warrant for the amount of the claim from the city comptroller, and upon the refusal of that officer to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Plaisie v. ColeWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. State ex rel. Ide v. CoonWashington Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. National Surety Co. v. Bratnober Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Willson v. BetschartWashington Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API