Legal Opinion
Katz v. Press Management Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 3, 1983PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Richard F. Kuhnen, J.
In these motions and cross motions for summary judgment the parties have raised two issues under section 240 of the Labor Law which are apparently of the first impression. Pleadings have been exchanged, depositions have been held, and plaintiff has provided a bill of particulars upon the demand of defendant Press Management Corp. (Press Management).
The essential facts are not in dispute.
Plaintiff was hired by defendant CC McK Food & Beverage Ltd. (CC McK) to install decorations in a portion of a building owned by Press Management. This portion of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Haimes v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Rocha v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Struble v. John Arborio, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Ploof v. B. I. M. Truck Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Cardile v. D'AmbrosiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kerr v. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- LaFontaine v. Albany Management, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- LaFontaine v. Albany Management, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Novell v. Carney Electric Construction Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1984
- Ramos v. Marksue Realty Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.