Legal Opinion · Dissent
Cardinale v. Genesee Valley Medical Care
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 25, 1983Published
1Dissent
Hancock, Jr., J. P., and Moule, J. (dissenting).
We do not agree that plaintiffs have presented any factual basis from which a jury could determine that defendant’s conduct lulled them into believing that the limitation period would *968not be asserted. Plaintiffs rely on several cases where defendant insurers waited until after the expiration of the applicable limitation period to deny submitted claims (see Dresserville Farms v Firemen’s Ins. Co., 54 AD2d 1118, 1119; Pasmear Inn v General Acc. Fire & Life Assur. Corp., 44 AD2d 647; Huggins v Associated Hosp. Serv. of N. Y., 53 Misc 2d 160).…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Pasmear Inn, Inc. v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Stanley R. Benjamin, Inc. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1972
- Dresserville Farms, Inc. v. Firemen's InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Huggins v. Associated Hospital ServiceNew York Supreme Court · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.