Legal Opinion

Doyle v. W. L. Douglas Shoe Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1904Published

Action by Margaret Doyle against the W. L. Douglas Shoe Company.

1Per curiam

Interlocutory judgment modified, by inserting provision therein allowing plaintiff costs of the demurrer as a condition for permitting defendant to answer, and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs of both appeals to the plaintiff, on the authority of Tallman v. Bernhard, 75 Hun, 30, 27 N. Y. Supp. 6, and Harmon v. Vanderbilt Hotel Co., 79 Hun, 392, 29 N. Y. Supp. 783, affirmed 143 N. Y. 665, 39 N. E. 20.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harmon v. Vanderbilt Hotel Co.New York Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Tallman v. BernhardNew York Supreme Court · 1894