Legal Opinion

Larry Goad and Co. v. Lordstown Rubber Co.

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided March 28, 1983No. 82-369C(2)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

560 F.Supp. 583 (1983)

LARRY GOAD AND COMPANY, a Missouri Corporation, Plaintiff,

v.

LORDSTOWN RUBBER COMPANY, an Ohio Corporation, Defendant.

No. 82-369C(2).

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D.

March 28, 1983.

William Ohlhausen, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff.

Leo J. Kelly, Pittsburgh, Pa., Robert F. Schlafly, St. Louis, Mo., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM

NANGLE, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Larry Goad and Company, brought this cause of action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. S 1332, to recover damages resulting from the purchase of defective rubber. The plaintiff contends that it is entitled to be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Groppel Co. v. United States Gypsum Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. O'BRIEN v. WadeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. General Electric Capital Corp. v. RauchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Fire Sprinkler Fabricators Corp. v. Bert's Refrigeration, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API