Legal Opinion

Singh v. Actors Equity Holding Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 10, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs argument that summary judgment should not have been granted because defendants failed to include signed, sworn copies of the deposition transcripts, is raised for the first time on appeal and thus, is precluded from review (Ta-Chotani v Doubleclick, Inc., 276 AD2d 313 [2000]). Were we to consider the argument, we would find that the signed, sworn documents were in defendants’ possession and could have been provided to the motion court had defendants been notified of the omission. Moreover, the deposition transcripts are admissible as plaintiffs own admission since the transcripts…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Telfeyan v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Ta-Chotani v. Doubleclick, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Morchik v. Trinity SchoolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Glover v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baines v. Daily News L.P.New York Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Perez v. Abbey Associates Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Perez v. Abbey Associates Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API