Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kollar v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1990No. 71A03-8906-CR-217Published

1DissentMiller, Judge

I dissent on issues 1 and 8.

First, I believe there was insufficient evidence to support Kollar's conviction on Count II, one of the predicate offenses underlying Count I (racketeering). Second, the aggravating circumstances recited by the trial court in support of enhanced and consecutive sentences are both improper-merely restatements of elements of the charged crimes-and insufficiently particularized.

In Count II, Kollar was charged with theft from Dennis Gerrard. Theft occurs when an accused secures control over property of another by promising performance the accused knows will not be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Francis Harry Brown, A/K/A Harry Brown, United States of America v. Marvin GreenblattCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  2. United States of America, at Nos. 89-5372/5383, at No. 89-5510 v. Gaetano Vastola, at No. 89-5372, at No. 89-5510 v. Elias Saka, at No. 89-5383Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. Townsend v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Linger v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Campbell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API