Legal Opinion

Lebeau v. Lebeau

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 3, 1921PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The sum, which the court ordered the libelee to pay to the libelant, is really alimony. To this the parties agree. Therefore, the question presented by the exception is whether the court had the power to give the libelant additional alimony. "The court upon proper application and notice . . . may revise and modify any order made by it, may make such new orders as may be necessary," respecting alimony. P.S., c. 175, s. 18.

"Applications under this statute . . . may be made at any time, and when an application is properly made, it is the duty of the court to hear and consider it . . . . On an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wallace v. WallaceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1907
  2. Ela v. ElaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1884

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Duss v. DussSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  2. Ward v. WardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1926
  3. Lilley v. LilleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  4. Rowe v. RoweCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Norberg v. NorbergSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API