Hartley v. Pennsylvania Railroad
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
This is an appeal from the action of thé court below in refusing to open a judgment of non pros entered against plaintiff for failure to file an amended statement of claim. Defendant filed an affidavit of defense, raising questions of law to plaintiff’s original statement of claim in trespass, which the court sustained with leave to plaintiff to file an amended statement within thirty days. No amendment having been made, judgment of non pros was entered against plaintiff by the prothonotary, upon order of defendant’s counsel, shortly after expiration of the thirty-day period…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Grier v. Northern Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- LaBar v. New York, Susquehanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Smith v. Ellwood City Ice Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Card v. Stowers Pork Packing & Provision Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
3Cited by4 opinions
- Euster v. Standard Accident InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Picking v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
- Cepull v. Borland, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Westmoreland County1952
- Grazer v. Newman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1950