Legal Opinion

Silbert v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 1, 1943PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

This is a bill in equity to compel the defendant assurance society to recognize a change of beneficiary requested by the plaintiff in a policy of accident and health insurance taken out by the plaintiff in 1922 in that defendant.

The plaintiff is the insured named in the policy. His estate was originally named as beneficiary with respect to the death benefits. The policy provides that consent of the beneficiary shall not be requisite to a surrender or assignment of the policy or to a change of beneficiary or to any other changes in the policy. In 1931 the plaintiff’s wife was made beneficiary.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hatch v. HatchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1812
  2. Maynard v. MaynardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
  3. Hawkes v. PikeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. Kendrick v.RayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Aronian v. AsadoorianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Garfield v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  3. Hunt v. RiceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  4. Murphy v. KillmurrayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  5. Kirschbaum v. WennettMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API