Legal Opinion

State v. Bennett

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 15, 1974No. C73-07-2070 CrPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.

Defendant, following his voluntary waiver of a jury, was convicted by the court of first degree burglary, ORS 164.225, and attempted rape, ORS 163.375. He appeals.

He first complains that it was error for the trial court to receive into evidence the result of a polygraph test. The polygraph test was taken pursuant to the following stipulation:

ÍÍ# # # * #

“The prosecution, by and through James L. Sutherland, Senior Deputy District Attorney, and the defense, by and through Brice L. Smith, with the express consent of the defendant, GARY GAIL BENNETT, hereby agree to and do enter into the following…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. ValdezArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  2. State v. FieldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. People v. HouserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. State v. RossCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  5. State v. TownsOhio Court of Appeals · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. BiddleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  3. State v. FrazierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. CataneseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  5. State v. GreenOregon Supreme Court · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API