Spaulding v. Sanford
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Spaulding in his trial attacked' the sufficiency of each count of the indictment and was overruled, United States v. Spaulding, D.C., 16 F.Supp. 407, and the judgment was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals. Spaulding v. United States, 6 Cir., 96 F.2d 734. The propriety of his conviction and sentence is res judicata. The question of whether service of his-sentence began at once or was suspended! during his appeal is not now for decision' on habeas corpus, since in neither event, would he be entitled presently to release. McNally v. Hill, Warden, 293 U.S. 131, 55 S.Ct. 24, 79 L.Ed. 238.
Jud…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McNally v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Bogy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
- United States v. BogyDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1936
3Cited by4 opinions
- Spaulding v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
- United States v. WalkerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Velazquez v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
- Sessions v. ManningDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1956