Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Brown v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1985PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: A parolee has the right to counsel upon a final parole revocation hearing (People ex rel. Menechino v Warden, 27 NY2d 376). While even a represented parolee may waive that right in the absence of counsel (People ex rel. Cleveland v New York State Div. of Parole, 110 AD2d 671; People ex rel. Martinez v Walters, 99 AD2d 476, 477, appeal dismissed 63 NY2d 727; see, People ex rel. Racona v Hammock, 115 AD2d 306), such waiver is not effective unless knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily made (see, People v White, 56 NY2d 110; People v McIntyre, 36 NY2d…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. McIntyreNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People ex rel. Menechino v. WardenNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. People v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. People ex rel. Martinez v. WaltersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. People ex rel. Cleveland v. New York State Division of ParoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Moll v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. People ex rel. Sinclair v. Warden, Rikers Island Correctional CenterNew York Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API