People ex rel. Brown v. Smith
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: A parolee has the right to counsel upon a final parole revocation hearing (People ex rel. Menechino v Warden, 27 NY2d 376). While even a represented parolee may waive that right in the absence of counsel (People ex rel. Cleveland v New York State Div. of Parole, 110 AD2d 671; People ex rel. Martinez v Walters, 99 AD2d 476, 477, appeal dismissed 63 NY2d 727; see, People ex rel. Racona v Hammock, 115 AD2d 306), such waiver is not effective unless knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily made (see, People v White, 56 NY2d 110; People v McIntyre, 36 NY2d…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. McIntyreNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People ex rel. Menechino v. WardenNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- People v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People ex rel. Martinez v. WaltersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People ex rel. Cleveland v. New York State Division of ParoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People ex rel. Moll v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People ex rel. Sinclair v. Warden, Rikers Island Correctional CenterNew York Supreme Court · 1991