Ordonez-Medina v. State

Roberto Ordonez-Medina appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion for posteonviction DNA testing, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853. The trial court found Ordonez-Medi-na had not met his burden to show a reasonable probability that he would have been acquitted if the DNA evidence from the firearm had been admitted at trial. See Lambrix v. State, No. SC16-56, 217 So.3d 977, 987, 2017 WL 931105, at *6 (Fla. Mar. 9, 2017) (“[I]t is the defendant’s burden to explain, with reference to specific facts about the crime and the items requested to be tested, how the DNA…