Legal Opinion

Mead Johnson & Co. v. Chester Discount Health & Vitamin Center

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 2, 1963No. Appeal, No. 166PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Musmanno,

The plaintiff, Mead Johnson & Company, sought in the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County an injunction to prevent the defendant Chester Discount Health and Vitamin Center, Inc., from selling the plaintiff’s products at prices less than those designated in a contract which the plaintiff had entered into with other dealers in Pennsylvania, thus invoking the machinery of the Pennsylvania Pair Trade Act (Act of June 5, 1935, P. L. 266, as amended, 73 P.S. §§7, 8).

The defendant filed preliminary objections averring that the plaintiff’s fair trade contract does…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burche Co. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Pepsodent Co. v. Krauss Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  3. Mead Johnson & Co. v. West Chester Discount, Health & Vitamin Center, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. John J. & Warren H. Graham v. Triangle Publications, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co. v. Ann & Hope, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  3. McKee's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Revlon, Inc. v. Chester Discount Health & Vitamin Center, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API