Legal Opinion
Guerrilla Girls, Inc. v. Kaz
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 28, 2004No. 03 Civ. 4619(LLS)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
STANTON, District Judge.
Defendants and proposed defendant intervenors (collectively “defendants”) move for leave to proceed either anonymously or by pseudonym. For the reasons that follow, the motion is denied.
Background
Starting in 1985 a group of women artists and art professionals came together to protest restrictions on, and promote recognition of, women in the arts. They called themselves, and their informal organization, “the Guerrilla Girls.” The Guerrilla Girls spread their message through various media, including posters, books and stage performances. Several of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Doe v. StegallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- W.N.J. v. YocomCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Doe v. ShakurDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- EW v. New York Blood CenterDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Doe I v. IndividualsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- XYZ Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
- Doe v. The University of Vermont and State Agricultural CollegeDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2022
- Does v. HochulDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022
- Jane Doe v. Harry McCarthyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2026
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.