Legal Opinion

People v. Diaz

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 25, 2005No. B170874PublishedCited by 4 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLIER, J.

Appellant Oscar Antonio Diaz was convicted of evasion of a pursuing peace officer while driving with “willful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property,” in violation of Vehicle Code section 2800.2, subdivision (a) (section 2800.2(a)). 1

Section 2800.2, subdivision (b) (section 2800.2(b)) permits the “willful or wanton disregard” for safety element of section 2800.2(a) to be established by “three or more violations that are assigned a traffic violation point count under Section 12810 . . . .” Appellant contends that his conviction must be reversed because (1)…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. Jackson CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2021
  2. People v. Montes CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. People v. WareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. People v. WareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API