Legal Opinion

Haney v. Pacific Employers Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 23, 1968No. 43264PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jordan, Presiding Judge.

Where, in a workmen’s compensation case, subsequent to an approved agreement providing for maximum weekly payments for total disability for a back injury, the insurer and employer seek to avoid continued payments by showing a change in condition and an offer of employment suitable to the impaired condition of the claimant, a finding of fact by the full board that the insurer and employer have failed to show a change in condition, if supported by any evidence, is controlling, and authorizes the award of the board directing the further payment of compensation within…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wood v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. MacZko v. Employers Mutual Liability InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  3. Royal Indemnity Company v. ManleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Randall & Lewis Lumber Co. v. RandallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  2. Keenan v. Jackson & Keenan Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. Satellite Security Corp. v. DelayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API