Legal Opinion

Kane v. Pennsylvania Broadcasting Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 30, 1947No. Civil Action 6634PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

The gist of the action is stated in the ninth paragraph of the complaint. It is averred that the defendant infringed the plaintiff’s copyright “by publishing and placing upon the market certain advertisements entitled ‘First Facts,’ which appeared in a certain publication called ‘Radio Daily,’ and which were copied largely from Plaintiff’s copyrighted books entitled ‘Famous First Facts’ and ‘More First Facts.’ ”

It appears from the exhibits attached to the complaint that the defendant used the words “First Facts” as a sort of headline for its advertisements and that…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. Roxbury Data Interface, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1977
  2. Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. Hobart Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  3. Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. Hobart Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API