Cornelious v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Presiding Justice.
1. In order to reduce a homicide from murder to voluntary manslaughter, as related to the doctrine of mutual combat, it should affirmatively appear that at the time of the homicide both parties were in position and manifested intention to fight. Mere threats on the part of one party at the time of a fatal shot by the other will not suffice. Tate v. State, 46 Ga. 148; Holland v. State, 166 Ga. 201 (142 S. E. 739); Brown v. State, 168 Ga. 671 (148 S. E. 583); Carter v. State, 171 Ga. 406 (2) (155 S. E. 670). The evidence in the instant case failed to show voluntary…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Hayes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Lumpkin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Wilcoxon v. AldredgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Tate v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Williams v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Joyner v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- James Lee Spencer v. Walter D. Zant, Superintendent, Georgia Diagnostic & Classification CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Amos Lumpkin v. James Ricketts, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Sims v. BalkcomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.