Legal Opinion
In re Kroll
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 20, 1995PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent, Arthur H. Kroll, was admitted to the practice *221of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on December 13, 1965. At all times relevant to this proceeding, he maintained an office for the practice of law in the First Judicial Department.
On or about August 6, 1993, respondent was served with a notice and statement of charges, involving falsified expense reimbursement claims for the period 1987 through 1990. The charges also alleged that respondent failed to maintain proper records with respect to these expenses and lied to the Committee when…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- In re GiegerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- In re SalingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
4Cited by7 opinions
- Gidatex, S.R.L. v. Campaniello Imports, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- In re PerriniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re RobbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re RapoportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re MyersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.