Concerning the Application for Water Rights of Tidd: Frees v. Tidd
Supreme Court of Colorado
1DissentJustice Marquez
T32 In this case, the majority recognizes, for the first time, a conditional right to appropriate the same physical water previously decreed to, and being diverted by, another appropriator. The applicants' proposed diversion of this water to generate hydroelectric power for household use is both creative and, by all appearances, environmentally sound. However, as a practical matter, the applicants' use of this water relies entirely upon a diversion under a more senior priority-indeed, the applicants seek to intercept a portion of the very water diverted under a senior irrigation right. In…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Weibert v. Rothe Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Santa Fe Trail Ranches Property Owners Ass'n v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- Navajo Development Co. v. SandersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Shirola v. Turkey Cañon Ranch Ltd.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Buffalo Park Development Co. v. Mountain Mutual Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.