Legal Opinion

Walter v. Warfield

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 15, 1844PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Baltimore County Court. This was an action of debt, commenced on the 18th August 1838, by the appellants against the appellees.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Baltimore County Court. This was an action of debt, commenced on the 18th August 1838, by the appellants against the appellees. The plaintiffs declared on a bond of Daniel Warfield and his sureties, to John Walter, to prosecute the action of replevin, mentioned in the exceptions, with effect, dated 25th July 1836. The defendant pleaded general performance ; and the plaintiff replied by way of breach, setting out the proceedings in replevin; and the judgment thereon, that the plaintiffs, the appellees aforesaid, “should take nothing by their writ, and that the said Walter should…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.

Note.- — The court refused the application of the appellant, to hear a re-argument of this cause.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crabbs v. KoontzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
  2. Seldner v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
  3. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. SingerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
  4. Mason v. SumnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1864

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API