Legal Opinion

Francis v. Government of the Virgin Islands

District Court, Virgin Islands

Decided December 5, 2002No. D.C. CRIM.APP. NO. 2PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

I.INTRODUCTION

Appellant Tiba Francis appeals his conviction for aggravated rape. See V.I.Code Ann. tit. 14, § 1700(a)(1) (Supp.2002) (“[Wjhoever perpetrates an act of sexual intercourse or sodomy with a person not the perpetrator’s spouse: (1) who is under thirteen years of age ...” is guilty of aggravated rape in the first degree.). At trial, he argued that mistake of fact is a defense to the aggravated rape charge, and moved that the trial court should allow the jury to consider such defense. The trial court denied his motion and held that section 1700(a) is a statutory…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. People v. HernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. State v. GuestAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Robert PinneyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Joyce v. Government of the Virgin IslandsDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API