Spano v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and facts in accordance with the memorandum and as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Certain findings of fact and conclusions of law disapproved and reversed and new findings and conclusions made. Memorandum: The claimant was awarded $55,500 for the entire taking of her property. It was conceded that the highest and best use for this property was commercial. At the time of the appropriation there was a dwelling house and combination garage and workshop on the property. The trial court awarded $40,850 as the market value…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Matter of ErlangerNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- New York Central and Hudson River Railroad v. DomproffNew York Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by6 opinions
- Emeryville Redevelopment Agency v. Elementis Pigments, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- In re West Bushwick Urban Renewal AreaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2008
- In re Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- In re Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.