Legal Opinion
Butts v. Randall
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 29, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.
The plaintiff instituted this action to foreclose a lien on the fund due the defendant Randall, as contractor, from the city of Johnstown on a paving contract. The amount of the fund is in dispute between the contractor and the city. Numerous other liens and assignments have been filed. The surety bond given the city guaranteed the performance of the paving contract and provided that the surety “ Shall also pay for all labor performed or furnished and for all materials used in the carrying out of said contracts.” All interested parties are joined as defendants. Many questions of law and fact…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. John L. Hayes Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Johnson Service Co. v. E. H. Monin, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Shultz v. C. H. Quereau Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Troy Public Works Co. v. . City of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Albany Builders' Supply Co. v. Eastern Bridge & Structural Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Teitler v. Parkside Wrecking Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955