Ex Parte Ellenburg
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
We granted each party's petition for certiorari review in this workers' compensation case. The Court of Civil Appeals reversed that portion of the trial court's award of benefits to the employee that had been based on a finding that the employee, Marlene Ellenburg, had suffered a 50% permanent disability as a result of an injury occurring on the job.1 The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed that portion of the trial court's judgment ordering the employer, Universal Forest Products, to pay the expenses of the employee's expert witness, a vocational expert.
The Court of Civil Appeals held that there…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Bankhead Forest Industries, Inc. v. LovettCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Littleton v. Gold Kist, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
- Stewart v. BusbyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
- Suit v. Hudson Metals, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Ex Parte Drummond Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Ex Parte Southern Energy Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Mayfield Trucking Co. v. NapierCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
- Star Rails, Inc. v. MayCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
- Fort James Operating Co. v. KirklewskiCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.